<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJVRM</journal-id>
<journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Veterinary Research and Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group>
<publisher><publisher-name>Thomson &amp; Ryberg Publications</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.62715/ijvrm.2026.v1.i1.pp7-13</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">a93eb295dd</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group><article-title>Lumpy Skin Disease in Cattle: Transmission Dynamics, Vaccination, and Control Across Asia</article-title></title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Ortega</surname><given-names>Latoya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Wojcik</surname><given-names>Themba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Nkosi</surname><given-names>Pooja</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>Department of Agri, Congo Academy of Agri, Switzerland</aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label>Department of Agri, Siberian Graduate Institute of Agri, Netherlands</aff>
<aff id="aff3"><label>3</label>Department of Agri, Tamiraparani Institute of Agri, Czech Republic</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* Correspondence: <email>latoya.ortega@congo.edu</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2026-06-28"><day>28</day><month>06</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<volume>1</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>7</fpage>
<lpage>13</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-02-14"><day>14</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-04-17"><day>17</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date>
</history>
<permissions><copyright-statement>© 2026 The Author(s)</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).</license-p></license></permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://trpub.org/article.php?id=a93eb295dd"/>
<abstract><p>Lumpy skin disease is a poxvirus infection of cattle and water buffalo that was confined to Africa for most of the twentieth century, moved through the Middle East into south-east Europe, and has since 2019 become established across much of South, East and South-East Asia. This narrative review brings together the published literature on three questions that determine how the disease can be controlled in Asian cattle populations. The first is transmission. Experimental work supports mechanical carriage of the virus by biting flies, mosquitoes and hard ticks, while direct contact appears inefficient, and long-distance spread is linked to the movement of animals. The second is vaccination. Live attenuated vaccines based on the Neethling strain of the virus have the strongest field record, vaccines based on sheeppox or goatpox virus give less dependable protection, and the appearance of recombinant strains containing vaccine-derived sequence has raised new questions about vaccine quality and diagnosis. The third is control in practice, where the experience of the Balkan countries is compared with the conditions of smallholder and free-grazing systems in Asia. The review closes by identifying gaps: the identity of the main vectors in Asian settings, the role of buffalo and wildlife, and the lack of vaccines that allow infected and vaccinated animals to be told apart.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author">
<kwd>Lumpy skin disease</kwd>
<kwd>Capripoxvirus</kwd>
<kwd>Vector-borne transmission</kwd>
<kwd>Neethling vaccine</kwd>
<kwd>Cattle</kwd>
<kwd>Transboundary animal disease</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1"><title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Lumpy skin disease (LSD) is caused by lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV), a large double-stranded DNA virus placed with sheeppox virus and goatpox virus in the genus Capripoxvirus. The three viruses are closely related, cannot be told apart by routine serology, and cross-protect to a degree that has shaped vaccination policy for decades (Babiuk et al., 2008). Affected cattle develop fever, enlarged superficial lymph nodes and firm, circumscribed skin nodules that may cover the whole body. Milk yield falls, bulls may become temporarily or permanently infertile, pregnant cows may abort, and hides are permanently damaged. Many infections are mild or inapparent, and deaths are usually few, yet the cumulative loss of production and the trade restrictions that follow an outbreak make the disease one of the costlier infections of cattle (Tuppurainen and Oura, 2012).</p>
<p>The disease was first recognised in Zambia in 1929 and for decades was regarded as an African problem. It reached Israel in 1989, spread through the Middle East, and entered Turkey in 2013 and south-east Europe and Russia from 2015. In 2019 it was reported from Bangladesh, India and China, and within three years it had been recorded in most countries of South and South-East Asia (Roche et al., 2020). The cattle and buffalo populations now exposed are among the largest in the world and are kept mostly by smallholders. This review considers what is known about how the virus spreads, how well the available vaccines work, and what these two bodies of knowledge imply for control in Asia.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2"><title>2. Scope and Approach</title>
<p>This is a narrative review of the published literature. It draws on experimental transmission studies, vaccine trials and field evaluations, outbreak reports from Asian countries, genomic analyses of field strains, and the guidance documents issued by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the European Food Safety Authority. Sources were chosen for their relevance to the three questions set out above and not through a formal systematic search. Older African and Middle Eastern work is included wherever it remains the main evidence on a point, as it does for most of the vector studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec3"><title>3. The Virus and the Course of Infection</title>
<p>The LSDV genome is about 151 kilobase pairs long and encodes genes for host range and immune evasion that are disrupted in the sheep and goat viruses (Tulman et al., 2001). The classical account of the disease, drawn from southern African outbreaks, remains accurate: an incubation period of one to four weeks, fever, nodules that involve the full thickness of the skin and later form necrotic plugs, and lesions in the mouth, respiratory tract and udder (Tuppurainen and Oura, 2012). After experimental inoculation only a proportion of animals develop generalised disease. Virus is abundant in skin nodules and persists there for weeks, and it is found at lower levels and for shorter periods in blood and in nasal, oral and ocular secretions (Tuppurainen et al., 2017a). Bulls may shed virus in semen for a prolonged period after recovery (Irons et al., 2005). The skin is therefore the main source of virus for whatever carries it to the next animal.</p>
<p>Laboratory confirmation rests on detection of capripoxvirus DNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Skin nodules and scabs are the samples of choice. Antibody tests are less sensitive, particularly in mildly affected and vaccinated animals, because protection against poxviruses depends largely on cell-mediated immunity (Tuppurainen et al., 2017a).</p>
<p>Clinical recognition is straightforward in a severe case and difficult in a mild one. A few small nodules on the neck, perineum or udder are easily overlooked or attributed to insect bites, pseudo-lumpy skin disease caused by bovine herpesvirus 2, dermatophilosis or demodicosis. The field manual prepared for veterinarians recommends that any cattle with multiple firm skin nodules and fever in an area at risk be sampled (Tuppurainen et al., 2017b). Mildly affected animals matter for control because they are the ones most likely to be moved or sold while infectious.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4"><title>4. Emergence and Spread in Asia</title>
<p>Figure 1 summarises the widening range of the disease. The first Asian outbreaks outside the Middle East were recognised in 2019. In Bangladesh the disease appeared in the south-east of the country in the middle of that year (Badhy et al., 2021). In India the first confirmed outbreaks were in the eastern state of Odisha in August 2019 (Sudhakar et al., 2020). China reported its first outbreak in the same month in Xinjiang, close to the border with Kazakhstan (Lu et al., 2021).</p>
<fig id="fig1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Milestones in the geographical spread of lumpy skin disease from Africa to Asia</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="IJVRM_V1I1_2026_02_Figure1.png" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="png"/></fig>
<p>From these footholds the disease moved quickly. Vietnam reported outbreaks in its northern provinces in late 2020 (Tran et al., 2021), Thailand followed in 2021, and Hong Kong recorded clinical disease in feral cattle (Flannery et al., 2022). A risk assessment prepared for the region had anticipated this course, identifying informal cross-border trade in live cattle and the density of susceptible animals as the main drivers (Roche et al., 2020). India experienced a far larger epidemic in 2022, concentrated in the western and northern states.</p>
<p>Genomic studies show that Asia received the virus by more than one route. The strains found in Bangladesh and India in 2019 resembled long-established field strains of African origin and were distinct from those then circulating in Europe and the Middle East (Badhy et al., 2021; Sudhakar et al., 2020). The strains detected in China, Vietnam, Thailand and Hong Kong belong to a different group: they are recombinants that combine sequence from field virus with sequence characteristic of live vaccine strains (Flannery et al., 2022). Viruses of this kind were first described in Russia, in regions where the homologous vaccine was not in official use (Sprygin et al., 2018; Kononov et al., 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5"><title>5. Transmission Dynamics</title>
<p>The seasonal pattern of outbreaks, with peaks in warm and wet months and a decline in cold or dry periods, pointed to arthropod transmission long before it was shown experimentally. Table 1 lists the routes that have been examined and the strength of the evidence for each.</p>
<table-wrap id="tbl1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Routes of transmission of lumpy skin disease virus and the published evidence for each</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th>Route</th><th>State of the evidence</th><th>Representative sources</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Stable flies (Stomoxys calcitrans)</td><td>Mechanical transmission to cattle shown experimentally</td><td>Sohier et al., 2019</td></tr><tr><td>Horseflies (Haematopota spp.)</td><td>Mechanical transmission shown experimentally</td><td>Sohier et al., 2019</td></tr><tr><td>Mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti)</td><td>Mechanical transmission shown for several days after feeding</td><td>Chihota et al., 2001</td></tr><tr><td>Other biting insects</td><td>Attempts with several species did not transmit; virus detected in some</td><td>Chihota et al., 2003</td></tr><tr><td>Hard ticks</td><td>Mechanical transmission by male Rhipicephalus appendiculatus shown</td><td>Tuppurainen et al., 2013</td></tr><tr><td>Direct contact</td><td>Inefficient when vectors are excluded</td><td>Carn and Kitching, 1995</td></tr><tr><td>Semen</td><td>Prolonged shedding by bulls documented</td><td>Irons et al., 2005</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
<sec id="sec5-2"><title>5.1. Vectors</title>
<p>No arthropod has been shown to support replication of LSDV. Transmission is mechanical: an insect interrupted while feeding on a nodule carries virus on its mouthparts to the next host. The first experimental demonstration used the mosquito Aedes aegypti, which remained able to infect cattle for several days after feeding on lesions (Chihota et al., 2001). The same group could not show transmission with the stable fly or with several other biting insects under their conditions (Chihota et al., 2003), a negative result that stood for years against strong field suspicion of Stomoxys. Later experiments with larger numbers of flies and donors with abundant lesions did achieve transmission by stable flies and by horseflies (Sohier et al., 2019). Male ixodid ticks, which move between hosts in search of females, can also carry the virus (Tuppurainen et al., 2013).</p>
<p>These studies establish which vectors are capable of transmission. They do not show which are responsible for it in a given place, and almost none of the work was done with Asian vector species or in Asian husbandry systems (Sprygin et al., 2019). Stable flies breed in manure and decaying fodder around housed cattle. Tabanids and mosquitoes depend on standing water and are strongly seasonal in monsoon climates. The relative weight of each is likely to differ between a tethered smallholder herd, a peri-urban dairy colony and free-grazing cattle, and this remains an open field question.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5-3"><title>5.2. Contact, fomites and animal movement</title>
<p>When infected and susceptible cattle were housed together in insect-proof conditions, transmission was rare, which led to the view that contact alone does not sustain an outbreak (Carn and Kitching, 1995). Shared water troughs, contaminated feed and reuse of needles during mass treatment or vaccination are plausible routes that have been little studied. Flying insects account for spread over short distances between neighbouring herds. Jumps over long distances are attributed to the transport of infected animals, including those incubating the disease or carrying mild lesions hidden under the hair coat (EFSA, 2015). In much of Asia cattle move along trade routes that cross several borders without veterinary inspection, which fits the observed pattern of sudden appearance far from known foci.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6"><title>6. Vaccination</title>
<p>Vaccination is the only measure that has reliably stopped LSD epidemics. All vaccines in widespread use are live attenuated capripoxviruses, and they fall into two groups.</p>
<sec id="sec6-2"><title>6.1. Homologous and heterologous vaccines</title>
<p>Homologous vaccines contain attenuated LSDV, most often derived from the South African Neethling strain. Heterologous vaccines contain attenuated sheeppox or goatpox virus and were adopted in the Middle East and parts of Asia where the sheep and goat diseases were already present and the use of live LSDV was not permitted. Direct comparison favours the homologous product. In a randomised field study in Israeli dairy herds, a Neethling vaccine protected markedly better than a sheeppox vaccine given at ten times the sheep dose (Ben-Gera et al., 2015). In an Ethiopian challenge experiment, a goatpox vaccine protected cattle while a Neethling vaccine and a strain marketed as a sheep and goat pox vaccine did not, a result that drew attention to differences between manufacturers and seed strains as much as between virus species (Gari et al., 2015). The field manual issued by the Food and Agriculture Organization accordingly advises homologous vaccine where it is licensed and available (Tuppurainen et al., 2017b).</p>
<p>The strongest field evidence comes from the Balkans, where coordinated mass vaccination with Neethling vaccines across several countries was followed by the disappearance of outbreaks, and analysis of the epidemic data indicated high effectiveness (Klement et al., 2020). A minority of cattle given Neethling vaccines develop a local reaction at the injection site, a short fever and drop in milk, and occasionally small generalised nodules, the so-called Neethling response. Owners who meet these reactions without warning may refuse later rounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6-3"><title>6.2. Recombinant strains and vaccine quality</title>
<p>The discovery of field viruses carrying vaccine-like sequence changed the discussion of vaccine safety. Recombination between poxviruses requires two viruses to infect the same cell, and the Russian findings were first read as evidence that a vaccine strain had recombined with field virus in vaccinated cattle (Sprygin et al., 2018). The origin of these strains is still debated in the literature, and contamination or mixing of strains during vaccine manufacture has been proposed as an alternative. Whatever their origin, recombinant viruses now predominate in East and South-East Asia, and they complicate diagnosis, because assays designed to separate vaccine from field virus by a single genetic marker can misclassify them (Kononov et al., 2019). The practical lessons are that vaccines should come from manufacturers whose seed virus and batches are independently tested, and that no licensed vaccine yet allows infected animals to be distinguished from vaccinated ones by serology (Tuppurainen et al., 2017a).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7"><title>7. Control in Asian Settings</title>
<p>European control combined early detection, movement restrictions, stamping out in some countries and region-wide vaccination, supported by compensation and reliable animal identification (EFSA, 2015). Few of these conditions hold where the disease is now spreading. Culling of cattle is unacceptable or unlawful in parts of South Asia, herds are small and numerous, animals graze communally, and veterinary services are stretched. Control therefore depends almost entirely on vaccination coverage, and coverage depends on vaccine supply, cold chain, the cost to the owner and trust in the product. Countries that began with goatpox or sheeppox vaccines because these were produced domestically face the question of whether, and when, to change to homologous vaccines.</p>
<p>Supporting measures have a modest but real place. Movement of cattle from affected areas, and especially sale of visibly sick animals, should be discouraged, although enforcement at informal markets is difficult. Insect control around animals may reduce biting pressure, but there is little evidence that insecticides or repellents alter the course of an outbreak, and they should not be presented to farmers as a substitute for vaccination (Tuppurainen et al., 2017b). Affected animals need supportive care and treatment of secondary infection, and clean needles should be used for every animal. Since the disease does not infect people, public communication can concentrate on animal health and on the safety of milk and meat.</p>
<p>Surveillance is the weakest part of control in much of the region. Outbreaks are reported by owners or field staff on clinical grounds, laboratory confirmation is available at a few national centres, and sequence data come from a small number of samples. A regional picture of which strains circulate where, and of how they respond to the vaccines in use, requires routine sharing of samples and genomic information between neighbouring countries, which the risk assessment for the region identified as a priority (Roche et al., 2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8"><title>8. Gaps and Future Work</title>
<p>Several questions are specific to Asia. The vector species responsible for transmission in monsoon and tropical climates have not been identified by field studies, and overwintering of the virus between seasons is unexplained. Water buffalo are susceptible but seem to be affected less often and less severely than cattle; their part in maintaining infection where they are kept alongside cattle is unknown. The same is true of wild bovids in the region. On the vaccine side, the comparative effectiveness of the goatpox, sheeppox and Neethling products actually used in Asian programmes has not been measured against the recombinant strains now circulating. Inactivated vaccines and vaccines with markers that permit differentiation of infected from vaccinated animals are under development and would remove two of the main obstacles to regional control (Tuppurainen et al., 2017a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9"><title>9. Conclusion</title>
<p>Lumpy skin disease has become endemic over a large part of Asia within a few years, carried by cattle movements over distance and by biting arthropods locally. The experimental literature identifies stable flies, horseflies, mosquitoes and ticks as competent mechanical vectors, but leaves their field importance in Asian systems unresolved. Homologous live vaccines of assured quality, applied at high coverage, have the best record, and the recombinant strains now circulating make vaccine quality control and careful diagnostic interpretation more necessary than before. Regional coordination of vaccination and of information on circulating strains offers the most realistic route to reducing the burden of the disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10"><title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>To be declared by the author(s) before publication.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11"><title>Funding</title>
<p>To be declared by the author(s) before publication.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list><title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Babiuk, S., Bowden, T.R., Boyle, D.B., Wallace, D.B. and Kitching, R.P.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Capripoxviruses: An emerging worldwide threat to sheep, goats and cattle</article-title>. <source>Transboundary and Emerging Diseases</source>, <volume>55(7)</volume>, <fpage>263-272</fpage> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2008.01043.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2008.01043.x</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Badhy, S.C., Chowdhury, M.G.A., Settypalli, T.B.K., Cattoli, G., Lamien, C.E., Fakir, M.A.U., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Molecular characterization of lumpy skin disease virus (LSDV) emerged in Bangladesh reveals unique genetic features compared to contemporary field strains</article-title>. <source>BMC Veterinary Research</source>, <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Ben-Gera, J., Klement, E., Khinich, E., Stram, Y. and Shpigel, N.Y.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Comparison of the efficacy of Neethling lumpy skin disease virus and x10RM65 sheep-pox live attenuated vaccines for the prevention of lumpy skin disease: The results of a randomized controlled field study</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>, <volume>33(38)</volume>, <fpage>4837-4842</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Carn, V.M. and Kitching, R.P.</string-name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>An investigation of possible routes of transmission of lumpy skin disease virus (Neethling)</article-title>. <source>Epidemiology and Infection</source>, <volume>114(1)</volume>, <fpage>219-226</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Chihota, C.M., Rennie, L.F., Kitching, R.P. and Mellor, P.S.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Mechanical transmission of lumpy skin disease virus by Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)</article-title>. <source>Epidemiology and Infection</source>, <volume>126(2)</volume>, <fpage>317-321</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Chihota, C.M., Rennie, L.F., Kitching, R.P. and Mellor, P.S.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Attempted mechanical transmission of lumpy skin disease virus by biting insects</article-title>. <source>Medical and Veterinary Entomology</source>, <volume>17(3)</volume>, <fpage>294-300</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare</string-name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Scientific opinion on lumpy skin disease</article-title>. <source>EFSA Journal</source>, <volume>13(1)</volume>, <fpage>3986</fpage> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3986">https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3986</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Flannery, J., Shih, B., Haga, I.R., Ashby, M., Corla, A., King, S., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A novel strain of lumpy skin disease virus causes clinical disease in cattle in Hong Kong</article-title>. <source>Transboundary and Emerging Diseases</source>, <volume>69(4)</volume>, <fpage>e336-e343</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Gari, G., Abie, G., Gizaw, D., Wubete, A., Kidane, M., Asgedom, H., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the safety, immunogenicity and efficacy of three capripoxvirus vaccine strains against lumpy skin disease virus</article-title>. <source>Vaccine</source>, <volume>33(28)</volume>, <fpage>3256-3261</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Irons, P.C., Tuppurainen, E.S.M. and Venter, E.H.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Excretion of lumpy skin disease virus in bull semen</article-title>. <source>Theriogenology</source>, <volume>63(5)</volume>, <fpage>1290-1297</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Klement, E., Broglia, A., Antoniou, S.-E., Tsiamadis, V., Plevraki, E., Petrović, T., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Neethling vaccine proved highly effective in controlling lumpy skin disease epidemics in the Balkans</article-title>. <source>Preventive Veterinary Medicine</source>, <volume>181</volume>, <fpage>104595</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Kononov, A., Byadovskaya, O., Kononova, S., Yashin, R., Zinyakov, N., Mischenko, V., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Detection of vaccine-like strains of lumpy skin disease virus in outbreaks in Russia in 2017</article-title>. <source>Archives of Virology</source>, <volume>164(6)</volume>, <fpage>1575-1585</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Lu, G., Xie, J., Luo, J., Shao, R., Jia, K. and Li, S.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Lumpy skin disease outbreaks in China, since 3 August 2019</article-title>. <source>Transboundary and Emerging Diseases</source>, <volume>68(2)</volume>, <fpage>216-219</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Roche, X., Rozstalnyy, A., TagoPacheco, D., Pittiglio, C., Kamata, A., Beltran Alcrudo, D., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Introduction and spread of lumpy skin disease in South, East and Southeast Asia: Qualitative risk assessment and management</article-title>. <source>FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 183. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome</source></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Sohier, C., Haegeman, A., Mostin, L., De Leeuw, I., Van Campe, W., De Vleeschauwer, A., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Experimental evidence of mechanical lumpy skin disease virus transmission by</article-title>. <source>Stomoxys calcitrans biting flies and Haematopota spp. horseflies. Scientific Reports, 9: 20076</source> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56605-6">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56605-6</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Sprygin, A., Babin, Y., Pestova, Y., Kononova, S., Wallace, D.B., Van Schalkwyk, A., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Analysis and insights into recombination signals in lumpy skin disease virus recovered in the field</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source>, <volume>13(12)</volume>, <fpage>e0207480</fpage> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207480">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207480</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Sprygin, A., Pestova, Y., Wallace, D.B., Tuppurainen, E. and Kononov, A.V.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Transmission of lumpy skin disease virus: A short review</article-title>. <source>Virus Research</source>, <volume>269</volume>, <fpage>197637</fpage> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2019.05.015">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2019.05.015</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Sudhakar, S.B., Mishra, N., Kalaiyarasu, S., Jhade, S.K., Hemadri, D., Sood, R., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Lumpy skin disease (LSD) outbreaks in cattle in Odisha state, India in August 2019: Epidemiological features and molecular studies</article-title>. <source>Transboundary and Emerging Diseases</source>, <volume>67(6)</volume>, <fpage>2408-2422</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Tran, H.T.T., Truong, A.D., Dang, A.K., Ly, D.V., Nguyen, C.T., Chu, N.T., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Lumpy skin disease outbreaks in Vietnam, 2020</article-title>. <source>Transboundary and Emerging Diseases</source>, <volume>68(3)</volume>, <fpage>977-980</fpage></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Tulman, E.R., Afonso, C.L., Lu, Z., Zsak, L., Kutish, G.F. and Rock, D.L.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Genome of lumpy skin disease virus</article-title>. <source>Journal of Virology</source>, <volume>75(15)</volume>, <fpage>7122-7130</fpage> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.15.7122-7130.2001">https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.15.7122-7130.2001</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Tuppurainen, E., Alexandrov, T. and Beltrán-Alcrudo, D.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Lumpy skin disease field manual: A manual for veterinarians</article-title>. <source>FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome</source></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Tuppurainen, E.S.M. and Oura, C.A.L.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Review: Lumpy skin disease: An emerging threat to Europe, the Middle East and Asia</article-title>. <source>Transboundary and Emerging Diseases</source>, <volume>59(1)</volume>, <fpage>40-48</fpage> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01242.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01242.x</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Tuppurainen, E.S.M., Lubinga, J.C., Stoltsz, W.H., Troskie, M., Carpenter, S.T., Coetzer, J.A.W., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Mechanical transmission of lumpy skin disease virus by</article-title>. <source>Rhipicephalus appendiculatus male ticks. Epidemiology and Infection, 141(2): 425-430</source></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Tuppurainen, E.S.M., Venter, E.H., Shisler, J.L., Gari, G., Mekonnen, G.A., Juleff, N., et al.</string-name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Review: Capripoxvirus diseases: Current status and opportunities for control</article-title>. <source>Transboundary and Emerging Diseases</source>, <volume>64(3)</volume>, <fpage>729-745</fpage> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12444">https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12444</ext-link></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>